Timeline for What can be done to remove obsolete answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2016 at 6:18 | comment | added | C.S.Cameron | Almost exactly the same goes for marking questions as duplicate, but that does not seem so unnecessarily complicated, as it helps maintain the status quo. I have seen some really bad calls in marking duplicates, almost like the reviewer read neither. A bad duplicate call also can make us loose valuable content. | |
| Nov 18, 2016 at 5:43 | comment | added | C.S.Cameron | If answers voted obsolete were moved to Archives, they would still be available, (for research etc), but not clogging up the site for a person looking for a current solution. | |
| Nov 16, 2016 at 17:26 | history | edited | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 43 characters in body
|
| Nov 16, 2016 at 13:14 | history | edited | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Nov 16, 2016 at 9:08 | history | edited | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
| Nov 16, 2016 at 9:01 | history | answered | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |