Timeline for Should I edit old answers to improve them?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Nov 7, 2016 at 6:30 | history | edited | ZannaMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 18 characters in body; edited title
|
| Nov 3, 2016 at 22:14 | comment | added | Jorge Castro | It likely means that someone ran into the same problem while searching on Google and answered. Think of AU more as a pile of interlinked wiki pages more than a forum. | |
| Nov 3, 2016 at 21:43 | vote | accept | Tony Lancer | ||
| Nov 3, 2016 at 21:38 | comment | added | Tony Lancer | @Rinzwind Do you mean that I should take my time in answering questions? Some posts today, I come three months later and post an answer? I find it bizarre when a post from 2010 gets a new answer this year when sometimes the answers have already been accepted. When I am checking questions to answer, I usually treat and help the OP as quickly as possible. Sometimes, that makes me crash, hard. | |
| Nov 3, 2016 at 21:34 | comment | added | Tony Lancer | @ByteCommander For myself, I struggle sometimes to bring good questions. The question I ask are usually beginner to semi-intermediate. I really want to ask those nice questions, but I sometimes can't(because I don't know any) or too afraid because of downvotes. I really do want to make AskUbuntu better. Also, I know how I am not supposed to change the meaning of rep, but sometimes it hits somewhere its not supposed to and you just change from there. | |
| Nov 3, 2016 at 19:53 | answer | added | ZannaMod | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 3, 2016 at 19:10 | comment | added | Rinzwind | Try to aim to make answers not time limited. | |
| Nov 3, 2016 at 19:06 | comment | added | Byte Commander Mod | It's always good to improve the site's quality. One way is by posting great new questions and answers, the other way is by cleaning up old (and not so old) low quality posts. If a rather bad post was unnoticed for a longer period of time, that doesn't really make it better, i.e. the same quality standards still apply and action should be taken accordingly. | |
| Nov 3, 2016 at 18:57 | history | edited | SethMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Nov 3, 2016 at 18:54 | history | asked | Tony Lancer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |