Skip to main content
added 7 characters in body
Source Link
anonymous2
  • 4.3k
  • 13
  • 18

There's an interesting question (link obsoletefor 10k'rs only) that was posted recently. On face value, it looks like a valid post. It asks a valid ubuntu question, but if you look a bit closer, it has a link to some real estate software site on the t in the word installed in the first line of the post.

My question is, what should I do in a case like this? Do I flag for deletion? Do I try editing it out and face potential roll-back wars?

There's an interesting question (link obsolete) that was posted recently. On face value, it looks like a valid post. It asks a valid ubuntu question, but if you look a bit closer, it has a link to some real estate software site on the t in the word installed in the first line of the post.

My question is, what should I do in a case like this? Do I flag for deletion? Do I try editing it out and face potential roll-back wars?

There's an interesting question (link for 10k'rs only) that was posted recently. On face value, it looks like a valid post. It asks a valid ubuntu question, but if you look a bit closer, it has a link to some real estate software site on the t in the word installed in the first line of the post.

My question is, what should I do in a case like this? Do I flag for deletion? Do I try editing it out and face potential roll-back wars?

Tweeted twitter.com/AskUbuntu/status/766179858586238977
Presicified
Source Link
anonymous2
  • 4.3k
  • 13
  • 18

There's an interesting question (link obsolete) that was posted recently. On face value, it looks like a valid post. It asks a valid ubuntu question, but if you look a bit closer, it has a link to some real estate software site on the t in the word installed in the first line of the post.

My question is, what should I do in a case like this? Do I flag for closuredeletion? Do I try editing it out and face potential roll-back wars?

There's an interesting question (link obsolete) that was posted recently. On face value, it looks like a valid post. It asks a valid ubuntu question, but if you look a bit closer, it has a link to some real estate software site on the t in the word installed in the first line of the post.

My question is, what should I do in a case like this? Do I flag for closure? Do I try editing it out and face potential roll-back wars?

There's an interesting question (link obsolete) that was posted recently. On face value, it looks like a valid post. It asks a valid ubuntu question, but if you look a bit closer, it has a link to some real estate software site on the t in the word installed in the first line of the post.

My question is, what should I do in a case like this? Do I flag for deletion? Do I try editing it out and face potential roll-back wars?

Corrected spelling, added info.
Source Link
anonymous2
  • 4.3k
  • 13
  • 18

There's an interesting question (link obsolete) that was posted recently. On face vaulevalue, it looks like a valid post. It asks a valid ubuntu question, but if you look a bit closer, it has a link to some real estate software site on the t in the word installed in the first line of the post.

My question is, what should I do in a case like this? Do I flag for closure? Do I try editing it out and face potential roll-back wars?

There's an interesting question that was posted recently. On face vaule, it looks like a valid post. It asks a valid ubuntu question, but if you look a bit closer, it has a link to some real estate software site on the t in the word installed in the first line of the post.

My question is, what should I do in a case like this? Do I flag for closure? Do I try editing it out and face potential roll-back wars?

There's an interesting question (link obsolete) that was posted recently. On face value, it looks like a valid post. It asks a valid ubuntu question, but if you look a bit closer, it has a link to some real estate software site on the t in the word installed in the first line of the post.

My question is, what should I do in a case like this? Do I flag for closure? Do I try editing it out and face potential roll-back wars?

Re-tagged
Link
anonymous2
  • 4.3k
  • 13
  • 18
Loading
Source Link
anonymous2
  • 4.3k
  • 13
  • 18
Loading