Timeline for Flags shouldn't be "declined" as if they were always invalid if they were valid when they were cast
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2016 at 10:45 | answer | added | OliMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 8, 2016 at 19:52 | comment | added | Byte Commander Mod | @jokerdino I can provide you an example from my recent flagging history: I flagged askubuntu.com/posts/807997/revisions as NAA when it was at revision 1 (and left a comment to the OP that he should summarize the link content - not sure, seems to be deleted now). Then the OP made a great edit and turned it into a good answer before my flag got reviewed. It shows up as declined now in my history (askubuntu.com/users/flag-summary/367990?group=1&status=3). | |
| Aug 8, 2016 at 16:41 | answer | added | Shog9 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Aug 8, 2016 at 15:46 | comment | added | user364819 | @Seth: Well, not all do this as there seems to be no set rule on it. And I just think that there should be a set way of marking it when it was, but is no longer, valid. | |
| Aug 8, 2016 at 15:42 | comment | added | Seth Mod | I always mark NAA flags helpful if I notice the post has been edited into an answer since the flag was cast. There is no guarantee that it will be noticed every time however. | |
| Aug 8, 2016 at 15:29 | history | asked | user364819 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |