Timeline for Why can't we upvote comments on this years mod elections?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Jun 8, 2016 at 20:51 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | "oh, only one person said that, it must not be so important" Sure, I did not think of that, good point. | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 20:42 | comment | added | Seth Mod | My problem is it leaves no way for the community to agree with a comment, other than adding a new comment (you should see the SO elections, so. many. comments.). It also makes all comments One-to-one (like you said) but IMO that marginalizes what the person is saying ("oh, only one person said that, it must not be so important"). Elections are not The LEGO Movie, everything is not awesome. My 2 cents on the issue. | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 19:56 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | I was thinking about this and it may not be a bad thing IMO. Having user express the opinion or concerns in there own words may help candidates more than a load of votes on the same single comment. | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 17:04 | comment | added | Seth Mod | Sort of. An SE employee told me that first the comment links broke, so when flags were received on nomination comments the moderators couldn't see where the comment was, because linking was broken. So they removed flags. But to do that they also had to remove voting. They plan to fix it all some day.. | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 16:38 | history | edited | Mark Kirby | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jun 8, 2016 at 16:29 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | Thanks, seems it is by design then. | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 16:27 | comment | added | Seth Mod | meta.stackexchange.com/questions/245030/… | |
| Jun 8, 2016 at 16:20 | history | asked | Mark Kirby | CC BY-SA 3.0 |