Timeline for What's the so called maliceous-voting-detection worth if this is happening? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
27 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 7, 2016 at 5:54 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | @SeverusTux Wow, thanks! | |
Jun 7, 2016 at 3:40 | comment | added | Severus Tux | @JacobVlijm If you are interested to know who lost how many (I lost 500+) go to users-->week and browse from the last page | |
Jun 7, 2016 at 3:39 | comment | added | Severus Tux | @JacobVlijm Plese dont quit. We (I) can't afford to lose a great script writer like you. For every problem you came up with amazing scripts!. Well I dont thing there are many more similar guys on AU | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 22:38 | comment | added | Wilf | Just guessing from the user's mentioned, but it may be thinking the users who do a lot for the site are rigging the system... | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 21:17 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | @Rinzwind This mornig I was 39600 (about) now less then 34000. No fun any more | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 21:16 | comment | added | Rinzwind | @JacobVlijm I have a +10 so -170 :) | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 21:16 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | @Rinzwind -160 as we speak... | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 21:14 | comment | added | Braiam | @Rinzwind and I'm inoculated :D | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 21:13 | comment | added | Rinzwind | my rep is going down as we speak (was -50 now -100) | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:57 | history | closed |
Pilot6 muru Shog9 |
Duplicate of I lost 3000+ rep as a reversal | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:54 | comment | added | Braiam | You may want to read this meta.askubuntu.com/a/15520/169736 | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:53 | comment | added | Pilot6 | @JacobVlijm We all know these people who lost the points today. They are not the same person. And they are not even friendly to each other in some cases ;-) | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:48 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 6, 2016 at 21:06 | |||||
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:42 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | @anonymous2 no, I got a notification why the minus was. As mentioned, with a nice question if I perhaps used an additional account for upvoting me? The words in my mind that pop up then are no good here. Nor anywhere else. | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:41 | comment | added | Pilot6 | @anonymous2 It is not related to deleted posts at all. | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:40 | comment | added | anonymous2 | Is it possible that some user who had passed out a lot of votes deleted his/her account? | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:40 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | @Pilot6 absolutely, but where the system's psychology is built on the Pavlov- green candy, a major demotivation on a major push down shouldn't be a surprise. | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:38 | comment | added | Pilot6 | The funny thing is reverting accepts from random users. | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:37 | comment | added | Pilot6 | Every system has glitches from time to time. The motivation is not only points. For me it is not. I post more at forums where there are no points at all. | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:36 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | @Pilot6 Thanks, I appreciate it a lot. I really think however this is fair, and really, it breaks my motivation completely, and not even so much for the points; it demasks the system. | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:35 | comment | added | TheWanderer | This doesn't sound like serial voting to me; it sounds like a glitch. | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:34 | comment | added | Pilot6 | Jacob, this is not that important though. Take it easy, even if it is not fair. | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:33 | comment | added | Pilot6 | Not 2. I thing about 10 are affected. I did not dig deep. | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:33 | history | edited | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 11 characters in body
|
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:32 | comment | added | TheWanderer | So 2 people? hmm | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:32 | comment | added | Pilot6 | A.B. and Fabby lost much more ;-) There are not many people who wrote many good answers. And it is not surprising that they upvoted each other without any cheating. | |
Jun 6, 2016 at 20:25 | history | asked | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |