Timeline for Why is a one line non-understandable answer used as review audit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Jun 1, 2016 at 2:05 | vote | accept | Kalle Richter | ||
| May 30, 2016 at 12:38 | comment | added | Kalle Richter | Given the fact that review audits are selected by algorithms only, there's no way of avoiding such strange audits except suggest a review for review audits (relatively few work for reviewers since #audits << #reviews). Give the fact that such extreme edits are extremely rare and that one won't drop all reviewer skill after experiencing such an audit as above, it's tolerable that this happens imo. Thanks for the explanation. | |
| May 30, 2016 at 12:24 | comment | added | Byte Commander Mod | @MarkKirby I just flagged it as well, linking this Q here... :) | |
| May 30, 2016 at 12:20 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | Good wording. No clue what should be done though. | |
| May 30, 2016 at 12:17 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | I flagged it for a mod, pointing them here as to why, good answer. | |
| May 30, 2016 at 12:14 | history | answered | Byte CommanderMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |