Timeline for Exchange votes or favours
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2016 at 0:04 | comment | added | bb216b3acfd8f72cbc8f899d4d6963 | This should be on Meta.SE in my opinion. | |
| Jun 6, 2016 at 20:51 | answer | added | Shog9 | timeline score: 13 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 20:03 | comment | added | muru | @oooooo not if you do it carefully enough. | |
| May 1, 2016 at 23:52 | comment | added | TryHarder | I thought it was against the rules to do serially upvote someone. I know for a fact that on other Stack Exchange networks, people get suspended for doing so. | |
| Apr 27, 2016 at 9:23 | answer | added | kos | timeline score: 16 | |
| Apr 27, 2016 at 7:27 | answer | added | don.joey | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 25, 2016 at 15:32 | comment | added | Pilot6 | I second this. It is very annoying. And I also have been an object of this kind of behavior. | |
| Apr 24, 2016 at 23:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/AskUbuntu/status/724375341171638272 | ||
| Apr 24, 2016 at 21:31 | comment | added | kos | I've been noticing this for a long while too. Luckily personally I've been dragged in into that kind of thing only a few times, but yeah, it happens pretty often, so I'm glad someone finally said it. | |
| Apr 24, 2016 at 21:27 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | @kos, glad I got this of my chest. have been dragging around with it for some time. .. | |
| Apr 24, 2016 at 21:22 | comment | added | kos | 100% on this one. It's also very annoying when you're the target of those aimed upvotes. You have to politely assume they read and understood your posts, and naturally you feel like you should do the same, which takes time since you don't want to upvote random posts. I fell for that a couple of times, and since then decided I won't again. Please just don't ask that kind of thing, neither explicitly nor implicitly. If you feel someone's posts are worthy, just upvote them in silence. I don't think anyone will have problems in upvoting your posts anyway, if they find them to be good. | |
| Apr 24, 2016 at 19:36 | comment | added | Seth Mod | I've noticed this trend too, and it is very disturbing. In general you shouldn't be asking people to vote for things; meta being the only exception I can think of, since there's no reputation and it deals with important policy changes. I know a lot of people take reputation here very seriously. I don't. That's ok, but don't be so childish that you need to go out of your way to get votes. Thank you.. | |
| Apr 24, 2016 at 19:07 | history | edited | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Apr 24, 2016 at 18:58 | history | edited | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 41 characters in body
|
| Apr 24, 2016 at 18:53 | history | asked | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |