Skip to main content

Timeline for Question about Answers

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Apr 11, 2016 at 13:43 comment added TheWanderer If you Google just bash, by the way, you get the Linux definition.
Apr 11, 2016 at 10:51 vote accept TheWanderer
Apr 11, 2016 at 10:31 comment added TheWanderer Thanks for the answer. I honestly expected it to be the other way around :p
Apr 11, 2016 at 10:25 comment added Oli Mod I really can't dispute that if you search for the right combination of words, you probably get your question answered. I just don't think that is justification for automatically labelling a question as bad or its poster lazy. And I do know squabbling about how easy or not it was to Google isn't a good use of anybody's time. LMGTFY is not the SE way. As above, there are more productive (and helpful) ways to deal with questions like this.
Apr 11, 2016 at 10:00 comment added muru OP knew enough to ask on Ask Ubuntu.
Apr 11, 2016 at 9:57 comment added Oli Mod As I say in my answer, there are situations that really make me wonder why people are asking us... But even there I don't attribute malice. We can handle this stuff by being helpful and informative without calling people idiots and fighting amongst ourselves.
Apr 11, 2016 at 9:54 comment added Oli Mod Sure, but knowing you need to add those words to your search is half the problem. The other half is not understanding those results. "Bash is a GNU POSIX shell". So what's {GNU,POSIX a shell}? Being accurate and concise is great but some basic questions deserve a bit of ELI5 treatment some times.
Apr 11, 2016 at 9:21 comment added muru You forgot to compare the results for "what does bash mean linux" and "what does bash mean Ubuntu". Neither of those results are that muddy - at the very least OP could have clicked through a few of them.
Apr 11, 2016 at 7:59 history edited OliMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 443 characters in body
Apr 11, 2016 at 7:46 history edited OliMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 443 characters in body
Apr 11, 2016 at 7:05 history edited OliMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 27 characters in body
Apr 11, 2016 at 6:59 history answered OliMod CC BY-SA 3.0