Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

There is a variation of this which is allowed, namely "Hidden Features of..."

Should 'hidden features of X' be removed/closed/locked?Should 'hidden features of X' be removed/closed/locked?

The difference as I see it, is these aren't just mindless lists of stuff, but pro-tips where experts share specific details about how they do things.

A simple "what is available" or "let's list all things of type X" does not fit this criteria at all.

There is a variation of this which is allowed, namely "Hidden Features of..."

Should 'hidden features of X' be removed/closed/locked?

The difference as I see it, is these aren't just mindless lists of stuff, but pro-tips where experts share specific details about how they do things.

A simple "what is available" or "let's list all things of type X" does not fit this criteria at all.

There is a variation of this which is allowed, namely "Hidden Features of..."

Should 'hidden features of X' be removed/closed/locked?

The difference as I see it, is these aren't just mindless lists of stuff, but pro-tips where experts share specific details about how they do things.

A simple "what is available" or "let's list all things of type X" does not fit this criteria at all.

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link

There is a variation of this which is allowed, namely "Hidden"Hidden Features of...""

Should 'hidden features of X' be removed/closed/locked?

The difference as I see it, is these aren't just mindless lists of stuff, but pro-tips where experts share specific details about how they do things.

A simple "what"what is available"available" or "let's"let's list all things of type X"X" does not fit this criteria at all.

There is a variation of this which is allowed, namely "Hidden Features of..."

Should 'hidden features of X' be removed/closed/locked?

The difference as I see it, is these aren't just mindless lists of stuff, but pro-tips where experts share specific details about how they do things.

A simple "what is available" or "let's list all things of type X" does not fit this criteria at all.

There is a variation of this which is allowed, namely "Hidden Features of..."

Should 'hidden features of X' be removed/closed/locked?

The difference as I see it, is these aren't just mindless lists of stuff, but pro-tips where experts share specific details about how they do things.

A simple "what is available" or "let's list all things of type X" does not fit this criteria at all.

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link

There is a variation of this which is allowed, namely "Hidden"Hidden Features of...""

http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/56669/should-hidden-features-of-x-be-removed-closed-lockedShould 'hidden features of X' be removed/closed/locked?

The difference as I see it, is these aren't just mindless lists of stuff, but pro-tips where experts share specific details about how they do things.

A simple "what"what is available"available" or "let's"let's list all things of type X"X" does not fit this criteria at all.

There is a variation of this which is allowed, namely "Hidden Features of..."

http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/56669/should-hidden-features-of-x-be-removed-closed-locked

The difference as I see it, is these aren't just mindless lists of stuff, but pro-tips where experts share specific details about how they do things.

A simple "what is available" or "let's list all things of type X" does not fit this criteria at all.

There is a variation of this which is allowed, namely "Hidden Features of..."

Should 'hidden features of X' be removed/closed/locked?

The difference as I see it, is these aren't just mindless lists of stuff, but pro-tips where experts share specific details about how they do things.

A simple "what is available" or "let's list all things of type X" does not fit this criteria at all.

Source Link
Jeff Atwood
  • 806
  • 11
  • 25
Loading