Skip to main content
deleted 49 characters in body
Source Link
kos
  • 40.9k
  • 1
  • 23
  • 38

I think I made a mistake.

I've always seen questions about Wubi being closed as off-topic because of it being discontinued, and since that itself made sense I endorsed the same practice.

However reading this post I understand I overlooked an important point, which is that Wubi is still an option for some supported releases (specifically 12.04.x and 14.04.x).

So I removed my close vote and my comment on that question.

I think that as long as 12.04.x and 14.04.x are not EOL we should provide support for Wubi on 12.04.x and 14.04.x (unless on UEFI or on Windows 8+ with an incompatible bootloader), as it is still a vaild method to install those releases.

After all if Ubiquity would be discontinued today we would still support installing supported releases which rely on it.

I think I made a mistake.

I've always seen questions about Wubi being closed as off-topic because of it being discontinued, and since that itself made sense I endorsed the same practice.

However reading this post I understand I overlooked an important point, which is that Wubi is still an option for some supported releases (specifically 12.04.x and 14.04.x).

So I removed my close vote and my comment on that question.

I think that as long as 12.04.x and 14.04.x are not EOL we should provide support for Wubi on 12.04.x and 14.04.x (unless on UEFI or on Windows 8+ with an incompatible bootloader), as it is still a vaild method to install those releases.

After all if Ubiquity would be discontinued today we would still support installing supported releases which rely on it.

I think I made a mistake.

I've always seen questions about Wubi being closed as off-topic because of it being discontinued, and since that itself made sense I endorsed the same practice.

However reading this post I understand I overlooked an important point, which is that Wubi is still an option for some supported releases (specifically 12.04.x and 14.04.x).

So I removed my close vote and my comment on that question.

I think that as long as 12.04.x and 14.04.x are not EOL we should provide support for Wubi on 12.04.x and 14.04.x (unless on UEFI), as it is still a vaild method to install those releases.

After all if Ubiquity would be discontinued today we would still support installing supported releases which rely on it.

added 32 characters in body
Source Link
kos
  • 40.9k
  • 1
  • 23
  • 38

I think I made a mistake.

I've always seen questions about Wubi being closed as off-topic because of it being discontinued, and since that itself made sense I endorsed the same practice.

However reading this post I understand I overlooked an important point, which is that Wubi is still an option for some supported releases (specifically 12.04.x and 14.04.x).

So I removed my close vote and my comment on that question.

I think that as long as 12.04.x and 14.04.x are not EOL we should provide support for Wubi on 12.04.x and 14.04.x (unless on UEFI or on Windows 8+ with an incompatible bootloader), as it is still a vaild method to install those releases.

After all if Ubiquity would be discontinued today we would still support installing supported releases which rely on it.

I think I made a mistake.

I've always seen questions about Wubi being closed as off-topic because of it being discontinued, and since that itself made sense I endorsed the same practice.

However reading this post I understand I overlooked an important point, which is that Wubi is still an option for some supported releases (specifically 12.04.x and 14.04.x).

So I removed my close vote and my comment on that question.

I think that as long as 12.04.x and 14.04.x are not EOL we should provide support for Wubi on 12.04.x and 14.04.x (unless on UEFI or on Windows 8+), as it is still a vaild method to install those releases.

After all if Ubiquity would be discontinued today we would still support installing supported releases which rely on it.

I think I made a mistake.

I've always seen questions about Wubi being closed as off-topic because of it being discontinued, and since that itself made sense I endorsed the same practice.

However reading this post I understand I overlooked an important point, which is that Wubi is still an option for some supported releases (specifically 12.04.x and 14.04.x).

So I removed my close vote and my comment on that question.

I think that as long as 12.04.x and 14.04.x are not EOL we should provide support for Wubi on 12.04.x and 14.04.x (unless on UEFI or on Windows 8+ with an incompatible bootloader), as it is still a vaild method to install those releases.

After all if Ubiquity would be discontinued today we would still support installing supported releases which rely on it.

Source Link
kos
  • 40.9k
  • 1
  • 23
  • 38

I think I made a mistake.

I've always seen questions about Wubi being closed as off-topic because of it being discontinued, and since that itself made sense I endorsed the same practice.

However reading this post I understand I overlooked an important point, which is that Wubi is still an option for some supported releases (specifically 12.04.x and 14.04.x).

So I removed my close vote and my comment on that question.

I think that as long as 12.04.x and 14.04.x are not EOL we should provide support for Wubi on 12.04.x and 14.04.x (unless on UEFI or on Windows 8+), as it is still a vaild method to install those releases.

After all if Ubiquity would be discontinued today we would still support installing supported releases which rely on it.