Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

As with last time, people didn't understand what you need. There are super-simple solutions available but you're adamant they're not good enough, but don't explain why.

You did give an example this time (which is a distinct improvement) but then you started saying things like...

I don't want to run a script that executes two commands...

#Why not?

Why not?

It's that sort of stuff that confuses people. It makes the problem seem artificial if there's no reason. People often don't like wasting their time; they'd rather help somebody with an actual problem.

So in the future, try not to be too particular. If you have a problem, explain what it is and how you think you'd like to fix it. If you're going to be particular (eg, not using open() in Python), you'll have to provide a reason.

As with last time, people didn't understand what you need. There are super-simple solutions available but you're adamant they're not good enough, but don't explain why.

You did give an example this time (which is a distinct improvement) but then you started saying things like...

I don't want to run a script that executes two commands...

#Why not?

It's that sort of stuff that confuses people. It makes the problem seem artificial if there's no reason. People often don't like wasting their time; they'd rather help somebody with an actual problem.

So in the future, try not to be too particular. If you have a problem, explain what it is and how you think you'd like to fix it. If you're going to be particular (eg, not using open() in Python), you'll have to provide a reason.

As with last time, people didn't understand what you need. There are super-simple solutions available but you're adamant they're not good enough, but don't explain why.

You did give an example this time (which is a distinct improvement) but then you started saying things like...

I don't want to run a script that executes two commands...

Why not?

It's that sort of stuff that confuses people. It makes the problem seem artificial if there's no reason. People often don't like wasting their time; they'd rather help somebody with an actual problem.

So in the future, try not to be too particular. If you have a problem, explain what it is and how you think you'd like to fix it. If you're going to be particular (eg, not using open() in Python), you'll have to provide a reason.

deleted 9 characters in body
Source Link
Oli Mod
  • 297.2k
  • 2
  • 147
  • 263

As with last time, people didn't understand what you need. There are super-simple solutions available but you're adamentadamant they're not good enough, but don't explain why.

You did give an example this time (which is a distinct improvement) but then you started saying things like...

I don't want to run a script that executes two commands...

#Why not?

It's that sort of stuff that confuses people. It makes the problem seem artificial if you don't have athere's no reason and people. People often don't like wasting their time; they'd rather help somebody with an actual problem.

So in the future, try not to be too particular. If you have a problem, explain what it is and how you think you'd like to fix it. If you're going to be particular (eg, not using open() in Python), you'll have to provide a reason.

As with last time, people didn't understand what you need. There are super-simple solutions available but you're adament they're not good enough, but don't explain why.

You did give an example this time (which is a distinct improvement) but then you started saying things like...

I don't want to run a script that executes two commands...

#Why not?

It's that sort of stuff that confuses people. It makes the problem seem artificial if you don't have a reason and people often don't like wasting their time; they'd rather help somebody with an actual problem.

So in the future, try not to be too particular. If you have a problem, explain what it is and how you think you'd like to fix it. If you're going to be particular (eg, not using open() in Python), you'll have to provide a reason.

As with last time, people didn't understand what you need. There are super-simple solutions available but you're adamant they're not good enough, but don't explain why.

You did give an example this time (which is a distinct improvement) but then you started saying things like...

I don't want to run a script that executes two commands...

#Why not?

It's that sort of stuff that confuses people. It makes the problem seem artificial if there's no reason. People often don't like wasting their time; they'd rather help somebody with an actual problem.

So in the future, try not to be too particular. If you have a problem, explain what it is and how you think you'd like to fix it. If you're going to be particular (eg, not using open() in Python), you'll have to provide a reason.

Source Link
Oli Mod
  • 297.2k
  • 2
  • 147
  • 263

As with last time, people didn't understand what you need. There are super-simple solutions available but you're adament they're not good enough, but don't explain why.

You did give an example this time (which is a distinct improvement) but then you started saying things like...

I don't want to run a script that executes two commands...

#Why not?

It's that sort of stuff that confuses people. It makes the problem seem artificial if you don't have a reason and people often don't like wasting their time; they'd rather help somebody with an actual problem.

So in the future, try not to be too particular. If you have a problem, explain what it is and how you think you'd like to fix it. If you're going to be particular (eg, not using open() in Python), you'll have to provide a reason.