Timeline for Make blockquote formatting button not destroy the source layout!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 21, 2015 at 11:28 | vote | accept | Byte CommanderMod | ||
Jul 20, 2015 at 7:00 | comment | added | kos | Ok now it's clear. Upvoted; unfortunately I can't delete my answer, since it has been accepted | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 6:56 | comment | added | muru | @kos see the new example. | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 6:55 | history | edited | muru | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 649 characters in body
|
Jul 20, 2015 at 6:54 | comment | added | muru | @kos they are, your example is flawed since it is a single word. | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 6:54 | comment | added | kos | It's not; long lines are not splitted, although short lines are indeed merged; again, I agree this is a problem , but it's not about OP's example. | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 6:51 | comment | added | muru | @kos yes, very much so. | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 6:51 | comment | added | kos | What do you mean? OP is discussing an editor's "feature". Do you think the editor's "feature" is the cause of that bad formatting? | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 6:49 | comment | added | muru | @kos both splitting and merging are done during wrapping. So, yes, this is due to the editor, not due to the user. | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 6:48 | comment | added | kos | This is a problem, but it's not the problem we're talking about; check the example; lines there are splitted, not merged, and this is up to the user who did the formatting, not up to the blockquote button acting fuzzily. | |
Jul 19, 2015 at 14:49 | history | edited | muru | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 56 characters in body
|
Jul 19, 2015 at 10:53 | history | answered | muru | CC BY-SA 3.0 |