There is one single point in the review uiUI that does not stopfail to irritate me when I see it:.
It's about how to understand the close reason "Off topic" Off topic-> "Bug reports"Bug reports.
I know that it has been discussed before, for example in
"Bug reports and problems with the development version of Ubuntu should be reported on Launchpad", which concluded it would be good to make some changes in the text.
Possibly there is a clear conseseconsensus that the text should be better, and how the meaning should change - but no documentet consensedocumented consensus on the exact text change. It could be that the problem of the text has multiple aspects, and the existing proposals fix only part of it - that's at least not obvious.
And I get confused because that text does not end after the second word.
It's that all I know about the question is that it is a bug report. So from plain logic, I can not make any other qualifications above that.
Is it true that the close reason applies to all bug report questions, or is the idea to prefer other close reasons about it, like "not about ubuntu"Ubuntu", "about an end of livelife version".?
An interesting point is that the information whether it should be reported at launchpadLaunchpad has some value. But that would require to understand the bug report much deeper, to decide which software seems to be broken, and whether that software is available in the standard repositories.
The current message seems to send all bug reports to launchpad, right?
"Bug reports and problems specific to development version of Ubuntu should be reported on Launchpad because it's useful"
Bug reports and problems specific to development version of Ubuntu should be reported on Launchpad because it's useful
All bug reports and some other bug reports go to Launchpad because it's useful.
"All bug reports and some other bug reports go to Launchpad because it's useful."
DoDo we actually mean that?