Timeline for EOL Policy Revisited: a case for letting Ubuntu questions be on-topic
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2014 at 7:54 | history | edited | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 75 characters in body
|
| Sep 26, 2014 at 13:08 | vote | accept | Nick The Swede | ||
| Sep 17, 2014 at 18:19 | comment | added | Oli Mod | Computers aren't responsible for anything. People are. It's similar with animals and (following my wildlife analogy) it's illegal to release (or facilitate the release) of vermin or harmful species into the wild, in many places. | |
| Sep 16, 2014 at 17:16 | comment | added | Nick The Swede | And by the way, I hope "Your choice..." here was a general 'you' and not directed at me personally, since I, (as I added in my PS) did indeed upgrade. | |
| Sep 16, 2014 at 17:13 | comment | added | Nick The Swede | I hear you, but think that the analogy does not really work: wildlife is not responsible to arguments, but people are (or at least can be). So why not allow the questions, choose not to answer them if you feel that they are not worth your time (or just add the 'update is a better idea' stamp to their questions), but let those inclined to help do so -- and they may of course also recommend updating. | |
| Sep 16, 2014 at 16:20 | history | edited | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 142 characters in body
|
| Sep 16, 2014 at 15:50 | history | answered | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |