Timeline for How to know which questions should be closed, a reprise
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Aug 19, 2014 at 2:08 | history | edited | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 780 characters in body
|
| Aug 10, 2014 at 23:07 | comment | added | Braiam | @Seth I'm only putting in contrast that the system doesn't always work how we expect them, this is more evident when Shog proposes more aggressive deletion criteria. | |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 0:39 | comment | added | Seth Mod | @Braiam Citing a breakage in the system like that is just silly. Tons of old questions are automatically deleted all the time. If we catch up with the new junk the system will take care old and we'll have a clean site. Imagine that! | |
| Aug 8, 2014 at 19:28 | comment | added | Oli Mod | Come on. That's a recent bug in the system. There's no suggestion it isn't being fixed. (edit: it's running again now) | |
| Aug 8, 2014 at 18:49 | comment | added | Braiam | @Oli "let nature run its course on the old stuff" well, I would love to, but it doesn't | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 18:39 | comment | added | Oli Mod | Given your entire post is a misrepresentation of our arguments, you'll have to forgive my approach but your first four paragraphs are about deleting old crap. Something can only quack so often before I call it a duck. Nobody is defending old crap however I am advocating on focussing all our efforts on the new posts (crap and otherwise) and to let nature run its course on the old stuff. | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 18:07 | comment | added | Braiam | @Oli "You're advocating spending more time on removing questions instead of answering things" I don't know what to say... but I'm suspecting you don't read my post at all. Read my last paragraph and tell me where you got it wrong. | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 17:42 | comment | added | Oli Mod | You're advocating spending more time on removing questions instead of answering things. That's my problem and that's what you're not understanding. Haven't you ever done any project management before? Our users and their time is finite. I'd love to have enough people to double-review every question and remove all the crap but that isn't the reality we're working in. | |
| Aug 7, 2014 at 16:56 | history | edited | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 59 characters in body
|
| Aug 7, 2014 at 16:51 | history | answered | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |