Timeline for If a question has nothing to do with one tag, or it's tagged wrongly, shouldn't I remove it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 24, 2014 at 7:44 | history | edited | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 29 characters in body
|
Jul 23, 2014 at 7:48 | history | edited | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 17 characters in body
|
Jul 23, 2014 at 7:44 | comment | added | Oli Mod | @Braiam I have tried to laser-focus my answer on the particular area of retagging that I take issue with. I also added an example. It should answer your questions including the deleted ones. | |
Jul 23, 2014 at 7:39 | history | edited | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 652 characters in body
|
Jul 22, 2014 at 15:21 | comment | added | Braiam | @Wilf I wouldn't care if that was the case, but in some of them not even the correct tags are added, by anyone. It pains me that a question that I could have answered in a triz-tras, I was never able to find it, because it was using the wrong tags all along. Really Wilf, you find a question that in days haven't got any answer and you see that you can fix it, will you not do it? We have problems just trying to keep up with the amount of questions, badly asked and tagged question and I feel that I'm the only one. | |
Jul 22, 2014 at 14:32 | comment | added | Wilf |
Aren't tags are sort of to categorise and make it easier to find posts - a question just tagged with apt isn't going to be found that easily, as it could almost be anything, whereas if has updates (not relevant to that question though), software-sources etc, it narrows down what it can be about. Merging tags and saying that a question can only have one or a few tags could mean that it just might end up with one called 'Ubuntu'... N.B. Braiam, are you trying to get the world record edit summary? :)
|
|
Jul 22, 2014 at 11:53 | history | answered | OliMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |