Timeline for Low-hanging fruit for new editors
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2011 at 10:01 | comment | added | htorque | No doubt, but as I said, it's an extreme example. Such a list could point to like 5-15 new questions/answers containing bad practices (which - other than in the above example - already have been taken care of so far). | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 8:55 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @htorque we don't support this concept of "minor" edits, it's just a way of sweeping things under the rug. The correct way to do mass changes is by contacting a moderator. | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 7:52 | comment | added | htorque | It's actually content, not tags. The 80 questions/answers are an extreme example I guess. A list like suggested by @JorgeCastro could be an easy way for new users to contribute by suggesting edits (e.g., "Windoze" -> "Windows", "QT" -> "Qt", etc.). The problem with bumping can be solved by adding a way to mark an edit as small/cosmetic, which then won't bump the question, but that's a different story (and has probably already been suggested/discussed). | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 5:16 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |