Recently I observe that obvious spam often gets far more down votes than spam flags would be needed for community deleting and locking:

enter image description here

Should we in case of an obvious spam post leave a comment so that users who don't know about the power of spam-flags will not downvote (this will remove the post from the front page and makes it harder to spot) but spam-flag appropriately to get the spam deleted more quickly?

Here is the relevant MSO link on spam flags:

share
    
I saw this spam on Skeptics.SE, but the user who posted it didn't have any accounts on other Stack Exchanges ... or so I thought. –  Andrew Grimm Mar 4 '13 at 23:16
2  
@AndrewGrimm Users often create separate accounts, sometimes even with the same display name. –  Eliah Kagan Mar 5 '13 at 10:48
1  
Do not downvote spam questions! Flag as spam and nothing else. If you downvote spam questions, they drop off the front page once they reach a score of -4, which reduces the chance that they'll quickly get the 6 spam votes needed to delete them. –  Gilles Mar 23 '13 at 13:29
    
@Gilles: ty - good point. I edited the Q. –  Takkat Mar 23 '13 at 13:43
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 8 down vote accepted

I've never thought about that but yes - it would be wonderful if you did!

share
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .